Skip to main content

How is The Giver a Cautionary tale?

Lois Lowry's novel, The Giver, takes place in a constructed world in which emotion, choice, and memory have been removed from the human community. Upon first introduction, this world seems perfect. Everything has an order to it, and nothing seems to ever go wrong. However, once more of Lowry's world is revealed, we see that there is actually a lot wrong with it. Humans do not love, nor do they feel pain. Jonas learns that individuals that do not fit perfectly into the community are "released" (killed). The humans in this community are living lives without passion or personal purpose.



The Giver is a cautionary tale that warns against giving too much power to governing bodies in exchange for comfort. Individuals living in the world of The Giver want for nothing in terms of daily comfort. Their dwellings, partners, family units, and occupations are arranged for them. In exchange for this security, however, they have forfeited personal choice. The Giver shows that while this ordered world seems perfect, it is actually far from it. The world Jonas ultimately flees lacks dimension meaning, and beauty. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.