I will focus on the United States and three significant effects on Americans' family life. The first was the huge mobilization of troops needed to fight a war on two fronts in Europe and Asia. Most able-bodied men under age 38 were either drafted or chose to enlist in the armed forces. This left many young families with absentee fathers. Second, the loss of male workers combined with the need for factories to run nonstop to support the war effort threw masses of women into the workforce. Women earned their own money and had a taste of freedom, but children were often left in daycare or, if older, to fend for themselves. Finally, rationing, which conserved resources for the war effort, left most families with little to buy and, because of gas rationing, few opportunities to travel. Instead, families were encouraged to grow Victory Gardens so more food would be available and to collect tin cans and other resources that could be recycled for the war effort. Families, when they did have leisure time together, were more likely to focus on life's simpler pleasures.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment