Skip to main content

What was manifest destiny? Why did Americans at the time believe it was just?

Manifest destiny was the belief that God wanted the United States to spread out over the North American continent, taking control of as much territory as possible.  Americans of the time believed in it because their country was strong compared to its neighbors and because this was a time in history when essentially everyone believed that might made right.


In the phrase “manifest destiny,” the word “manifest” means something like “obvious.”  The phrase, then, referred to America’s obvious destiny.  People believed that it was obvious that God wanted their country to succeed, grow, and spread.  This was part of what motivated the Mexican-American War and the westward expansion across the continent that snapped up Indian lands and pushed the natives onto reservations (or simply killed them).


People believed this because the US was clearly the strongest country on the continent.  Mexico was weak and constantly wracked with internal disorder.  Canada was not a country yet, just a colonial outpost of the British Empire that was no threat to the US.  The Indians were very few in number and lacked the technological sophistication to worry the Americans if the latter came west in any large numbers. 


In this situation, it made sense for people of the time to think that God favored them.  Across the world at that time, people believed that might made right.  They believed that a country was justified in taking land from other countries if it had the military power to do so.  They also believed that God decided everything about the world.  Therefore, they believed that he selected some countries to be strong because they deserved it and condemned others to be weak because there was something wrong with the people of those countries.


Because people of this time believed things like this, it is not surprising that they believed in manifest destiny.  Their country was clearly wealthier and stronger than those around it.  Therefore, it was clearly destined by God to spread at the expense of those other, weaker, peoples.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...