Skip to main content

What is the work done if we apply a 1.2N force and we move 4 meters in the direction of force?

This question can be solved by using the equation that Work = Force x Distance. 


The force provided is 1.2 Newtons and the distance moved is 4 meters.  


Work = 1.2 x 4


Work = 4.8 Joules


A Joule is the unit for work, and it is equivalent to one Newton of force causing a movement of one meter. 


What's interesting about work is the fact that a distance of movement must occur in the direction of the force for work to have been done.  Mathematically, it looks simple.  


Work = 50 N x 0 meters


Work = 0 Joules


Mathematically, that looks completely legitimate; however, there are some frustrating examples of forces doing zero work.  I like to demonstrate by having a student push against my classroom wall as hard as they can for 30 seconds or so.  Students are shocked to find out that despite being tired, they did zero work.  The wall didn't move.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more