Skip to main content

How is the Renaissance a time very similar to our own? (ex: power struggles, ideologies, physical, force..). Thanks

The Renaissance can be considered a time very similar to our own in that the Renaissance looked back to an earlier period (ancient Greece and Rome) as kind of a "golden era" that it sought to emulate.  Today's politicians, while the stakes are not life and death (as they were with the Medici in Italy) look back to earlier days for guidance.  One branch of the Republican party looks back to Thomas Jefferson in its attempt to minimize the role of government--this can be the Tea Party.  Another branch looks to Reagan in terms of tax breaks and military power.  The Democrats in this election are moving towards the left with Clinton and Sanders's tax plans for the rich and promises to working class Americans. Just like in the days of the Renaissance, most politicians are quite wealthy and they have followers who can work for them.  While the politicians of the Renaissance used the arts to hopefully gain a positive place in history, today's politicians use news sources and biographers to improve their public images.   


The Renaissance was also an empowering time for ideas.  More people were encouraged to think for themselves with the availability of books through the printing press.  More people are encouraged to educate themselves through sites like this one and smartphones.  I know your question was largely about the politics of the time period, but one would be remiss if one did not mention the learning opportunities of this period too.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.