Skip to main content

How are the protagonists similar and different in When the Sleeper Wakes and 1984? Examine the view that idealized figures are used as mechanisms...

Winston (1984) and Graham (When The Sleeper Wakes) are both idealized figures in the respective novels.


Both men are avowed revolutionaries, and both rebel because of their conscientious natures. Both are also drawn to treacherous men who betray them. Additionally, Winston and Graham experience individual epiphanies that alert them to the dangers that surround them. Graham awakes from more than two centuries of a "cataleptic trance" to face the fight of his life. Similarly, Winston comes to realize that Big Brother is malevolent in nature and that he must be defeated.


On the surface, Winston appears to be a confirmed loyalist, but internally, he is a rebel. Graham differs here slightly in the sense that he leads an open revolt against the Council (albeit in a confused state of mind) and later, against Ostrog himself. In Winston's case, however, he consistently cherishes a pessimistic view of the rebel effort. By the time the novel begins, Winston is in a state of full-blown paranoia, sequestering himself at regular intervals in order to scribble "DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER" into his diary. His paranoia is a debilitating influence; he feels that, no matter what he does, the "Thought police would get him just the same."


On the other hand, Graham firmly and unequivocally stands his ground in the rebel fight. Both Winston and Graham fight courageously to save their societies; however, Graham fights overtly while Winston fights in the shadows.


Both men fall into the same trap of trusting faithless mentors. Winston puts himself in O'Brien's hands, and Graham initially trusts Ostrog implicitly. However, both O'Brien and Ostrog use their proteges' idealized natures against them. O'Brien tricks Winston into committing the ultimate crime against Big Brother, and he oversees Winston's torture. For his part, Ostrog secretly plots Graham's downfall while beguiling his protege into thinking that he has his best interests at heart. With the full force of the Black Police at his disposal, Ostrog tries to enslave the rebels and to topple Graham from power.


In the end, both men experience similarly despairing fates. Winston is tortured to mental oblivion, and he betrays his lover, Julia, during his ordeal. By the end of the novel, he is a broken man, enamored with Big Brother and effectively transformed into a shell of his former self. O'Brien has essentially manipulated, molded, and tortured Winston into an instrument of the state. Winston's idealism has been distorted purposefully; the torture of innocents is the mechanism by which the state controls the masses. Similarly, Graham meets a devastating end. His plane is shot down by Ostrog's plane, and the novel ends on an ominous note. The author leaves no indication that Graham survives his crash.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...