Skip to main content

If it is true that nothing or less than nothing happens in Waiting for Godot, how is it that we manage to be entertained as the audience? If...

I believe that most people would agree that the play is intended to illustrate the author's vision that there is no meaning or purpose in life. It might be called existentialistic, but existentialism goes beyond asserting that there is no external or supernatural meaning to human existence. Existentialism seems to encourage people to create their own meaning in their lives. I don't believe Beckett cared whether his audiences did that or not. He seems utterly nihilistic. He does not seem to want to suggest any solution to the human dilemma. Life is meaningless. Period. There is a barely discernible humor running throughout the play. It can be regarded as a comedy. The fact that life is a bad joke on all of us can be seen as funny. The two tramps are funny. When the play was first produced in America, one of the tramps was played by the comedian Bert Lahr, who played the Cowardly Lion in the famous movie The Wizard of Oz. Lahr understood the play as a comedy. It is also easy to see the relationship between Lucky and Pozzo as comical. 


Some people can't stand the play because, as you say, "nothing or less than nothing happens." It is not like most plays, like those of Ibsen for instance, in which the author holds the audience with some big social problem to which he offers a solution. If life is meaningless, then there really is no problem, and there can be no solution and no reasonable motivation. People who like the play appreciate its comic, or ironic, picture of the meaninglessness of existence. This seems like a sophisticated attitude. Life has no meaning, but still we go on living. The alternative is to hang ourselves--but why do that? That wouldn't have any meaning either. So we all go on waiting for something to happen, like Vladimir and Estragon. They are just tramps and we laugh at them--but at least they know what they are waiting for. They are waiting for a man named Godot because they obviously expect him to give them a handout. There must really be a man named Godot and he must know they are waiting for him. Twice he sends a boy to tell them he can't come today but will come tomorrow. Part of what is laughable about the situation is that these two tramps should expect anyone to care about them. Godot may care a little, but not very much.


The play was first produced in French in 1953. That was about sixty-three years ago, and it is still being staged all over the world, still being talked about and debated over, still being assigned reading in college courses. It has become a classic--and yet, "nothing or less than nothing happens." If life is meaningless, then it is quite appropriate that a play should be meaningless. That is what makes it "absurd." Since it is absurd, it is funny, in an unsettling sort of way. It doesn't tell audiences to find their own meaning, or to create their own (perhaps arbitrary and contrived) meaning. It leaves them wondering what it's all about, just as they are wondering whether Godot will ever show up.


I feel I have just added more words to the millions that have already been expended trying to explain the "meaning" of this annoying but fascinating play.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...