Skip to main content

Please explain some parallelism relating to Myrtle Wilson in The Great Gatsby.

First, Myrtle Wilson and her husband, George Wilson, are both just trying to get ahead in a world that really doesn't allow people who come from little to end up with a lot.  George badly desires to buy Tom Buchanan's older car from him so that he can sell it for a profit, but Tom just keeps stringing him along.  Myrtle badly desires to supplant Tom's wife, Daisy, but Tom keeps stringing her along knowing that he'll never give her what she wants.  In his interactions with George, Tom can feel superior and in control.  In his interactions with Myrtle, he clearly also feels the same (he strikes her in the face when she disobeys him).  He uses them both to make himself feel good, and in this way, Myrtle's story runs parallel to her husband's.


Second, Myrtle Wilson seems to be trying to use Tom as well in her attempt to reach the American Dream.  She doesn't want to work for her prosperity as her husband does; she wants her rich lover to buy her pretty things and keep her in a nice apartment with beautiful clothes.  Love doesn't really seem to be a major factor for her in their relationship.  It's the same with Tom's wife, Daisy.  At this point, she really doesn't love him anymore; she loves Gatsby.  But once she finds out how Gatsby, the man she does love, has acquired his fortune -- illegally -- she returns, without hesitation, to her husband: the man with "old money" who can provide her with the kind of life she desires (just the same reason that Myrtle turns to Tom as well).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more