Skip to main content

What is the main conflict in Ray Bradbury's, "A Sound of Thunder"?

The main conflict in Ray Bradbury's 1952 short story, "A Sound of Thunder," is man vs.nature. Eckels lets his fear of the beast he is hunting overtake him, and in so doing, makes careless mistakes. These mistakes have monumental consequences for the whole of human history. 


The story takes place in the future and centers on a man named Eckels who hunts big game. He has conquered all the big game in his environment and is drawn to a company called Time Safari, Inc., which specializes in time travel hunting. He pays a large sum of money to hunt a Tyrannosaurus Rex during the Cretaceous period. 


Travis, his safari guide, has carefully explained the importance of not disturbing anything in the past. The company takes many precautions to ensure that what they do in the past doesn't alter the future. 


Before they take clients on a safari, a guide goes back in time to scout out an animal that was going to die of some natural cause. They calibrate the hunting expedition to within minutes of when the natural death would have occurred so they do not interrupt the natural sequence of events. Travis warns:



"The stomp of your foot, on one mouse, could start an earthquake, the effects of which could shake our earth and destinies down through Time, to their very foundations." 



Eckels, having a hard time believing the impact of such small actions, asks further questions, to which Travis replies: 



"Crushing certain plants could add up infinitessimally. A little error here would multiply in sixty million years, all out of proportion."



When it comes time to shoot the Tyrannosaurus Rex, Eckels is petrified with fear. Travis becomes impatient with him and tells him to return to the time machine. On his way back, Eckels accidentally steps off the anti-gravity metal path that has been built by the company to ensure that not even a blade of grass is harmed during the expeditions. Travis sends Eckels back to the carcass to remove the bullets, which must not be left in the past. He feels that this will teach Eckels a lesson about signing up for hunts he's not capable of completing. On the way back, Eckels tramples a butterfly. 


Upon his return to 2065, he notices the company sign has changed. The lettering is different. He begins to fear that Travis' warnings have been correct. 



"Eckels felt himself fall into the chair. He fumbled crazily at the thick slime on his boots. He held up a clod of dirt, trembling. 'No, it can't be, not a little thing like that! No!' Embedded in the mud, glistening green and gold and black, was a butterfly, very beautiful, and very dead." 



Horrified, Eckels asked the man at the front desk who won the presidential election. Instead of answering President Keith, as he had when Eckels went on the safari, he answers Deutscher, his opponent with dictatorial beliefs. Eckels realizes that when he left the path, he altered the course of human history in exponential ways. 


Though there is a minor conflict of man vs. man with Eckels and Travis, the main conflict is man vs. nature. Eckels alters the course of history by damaging an insect, a butterfly. This disruption to the ecosystem sets in motion a chain reaction that alters everything in the known world in a negative way. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more