Skip to main content

In his "Letter from a Birmingham City Jail," how does King feel about the Birmingham Police Department and how they act “'nonviolently’ in...

In his “Letter from a Birmingham City Jail,” Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. says that we should not think highly of the Birmingham city police just because they have acted nonviolently during the recent protests.  Instead, he says, we should realize that their relative nonviolence has been a moral tactic deployed in support of an immoral cause.  We should realize, then, that it is only moral to be nonviolent if one’s goals are worthy.


Just before the passage you cite, King takes issue with the idea that the Birmingham police really are truly nonviolent.  He talks about how they treat black men and women very poorly.  He writes about police “dogs sinking their teeth into unarmed, nonviolent Negroes.”  He describes how the police “slap and kick old Negro men and young boys.”  He essentially says that they are not as nonviolent as his critics say they are.


However, King then goes on to admit that the police have been relatively nonviolent with regard to the recent protests.  He says that



the police have exercised a degree of discipline in handling the demonstrators. In this sense they have conducted themselves rather "nonviolently" in public.



Even so, he says, this does not make them worthy of praise.  The fact that they have acted nonviolently does not make them moral.  He points out that the police have acted nonviolently in order to “preserve the evil system of segregation.”  This, he says, makes their actions immoral even though they are nonviolent.  He argues that it is wrong “to use moral means to preserve immoral ends.”  Because the Birmingham police are doing this, King feels that they are immoral even if they are acting relatively “nonviolently” in public.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.