Skip to main content

As the story ends, what do you think Orwell has to say about the Russian Revolution and the people that were behind it all of it? Explain what it...

At the heart of Orwell's story is the message that the leaders of the Russian Revolution (who are represented by the pigs) treated the people no better than those who came before. In fact, as the story closes,  the reader is left with the powerful image of the pigs walking on two legs, drinking alcohol and living in the farmhouse. This suggests that the leaders of the Revolution sought to emulate the power and lifestyle of previous leaders, the very people whom they claimed to hate at the beginning of the story.


Moreover, through the Seven Commandments, Orwell shows that the leaders broke their promises to create equality. This is shown most clearly when it is revealed that the Commandments have been replaced by a single rule:



"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others."



Finally, through the portrayal of Napoleon, Orwell shows that the original leaders did not forget their vision. In fact, he suggests that they deliberately set out to create a totalitarian regime. In the story, this begins when Napoleon steals the milk and apples so that it can be mixed into the pigs' mash. This demonstrates his selfishness and political ambition, marking the beginning of his rise to absolute leader.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.