Skip to main content

Is Macbeth a puppet of forces he cannot control? If not, what forces does he control?

This is a really difficult question to answer, mostly because Shakespeare leaves the notion of fate in Macbeth as fairly ambiguous. The answer will change depending on how you interpret Shakespeare's work, so you should view the following answer as my particular interpretation. Other scholars might differ in their views, and they would be justified in doing so.


Here's my take on the issue: there is, of course, the Weird Sisters' initial prophecy that Macbeth will be king, and so there seems to be a certain amount of fate at work, which would suggest that Macbeth is indeed a puppet of larger, universal forces and is not fully in control of his own actions. However, while Shakespeare begins the play with a cryptically prophetic statement on the gloomy moors, he never fully commits to the idea that Macbeth is a mere puppet being used by fate. No matter what fate might "plan" for us, Shakespeare suggests, we always have the ability to choose.


For instance, even though Macbeth is prophesied to become king, the Weird Sisters never explicitly say that he is fated to kill King Duncan and usurp the throne; that's merely a result of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth's interpretation of the prophesy. Therefore, it's possible that Macbeth could have chosen to remain a loyal and honest man, and that he could have become king by honorable and legal means later in life. Since the Weird Sisters never specifically describe the manner by which Macbeth will become king, his method for assuming the power of the crown seems to be a force that he controls. However, Macbeth rushes to fulfill the prophesy by murdering Duncan in his sleep, and so he chooses the quick and violent path. The fact that Macbeth makes this choice with his own free will is the true tragedy of the play, as it proves that this formerly honorable man is capable of using his free will to perform great evil. Thus, the quick answer to this question is that, though fate could be at work, Macbeth is in control of his decision to murder Duncan, a fact that makes this act all the more hideous.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more