Skip to main content

Why do you think there is such a harsh penalty for disobeying the instructions, in the story "A Sound of Thunder," by Ray Bradbury?

Eckels is told very early on in the story that Time Safari, Inc. has strict rules.  He is told to sign documents agreeing to the fact too.  If he breaks the rules, there is a stiff monetary penalty.  Once in the machine, Travis continues to stress the importance of staying on the path and only shooting what they are told to shoot.  Eckels asks why there are all of those rules about not doing anything to disturb past events.  Travis explains it with a mouse.  He says that if a single mouse were to die in the past, all of its descendants would then never exist.  The death of a single mouse could potentially wipe out billions of mice in the following years.  That would also have a huge impact on any food chain that depended on the mice.  Time Travel, Inc. doesn't know if small actions like that will actually come true, but they are not willing to risk the potential; therefore, they have harsh penalties in place to deter customers from trying to mess around with past events.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.