Skip to main content

How did early civilizations deal with democracy? What were its major limitations? Is democracy compatible with running an empire?

Democracy was a very rare phenomenon in antiquity. Most of the great empires, such as the Egyptian, Mesopotamian, and Persian ones, were actually monarchies, often theocratic in nature. The two ancient civilizations that experimented with democratic governments had only limited success with the experiments.


The first major democracy, and one that has very much influenced the subsequent growth of this form of political organization was that of Athens. Strikingly, it was a direct democracy in which all citizens could participate by speaking in the Assembly and voting directly on laws. Many of the important positions in Athens were selected by lot to prevent corruption. What made this workable is that there were fewer than 50,000 citizens in Athens, and normal attendance at the Assembly was probably around 10,000. Membership in the Assembly was restricted to males over the age of 18 with Athenian parents or grandparents. Women, slaves, and metics (resident aliens) who constituted the actual majority of the population, could not vote.


The so-called Athenian Empire began as the Delian League, an alliance among Greek city-states against Persia's efforts to conquer Greece. After the defeat of the Persians, Athens, although internally a democracy, behaved increasingly tyrannically in the Delian League, looting its treasury to rebuild the Acropolis and treating other members as subordinate, behavior that soon led to the Peloponnesian Wars. Thucydides argues that democracy led somewhat inevitably to tyrannical behavior, as demagogues like Clean would inflame nativist and oppressive tendencies to maintain their power and popularity. As the "Athenian Empire" lasted only 50 years, we can say that the Athenian democracy did not display much competency in imperial rule.


Rome also began as a small Republic, but its administrative mechanisms were not really adequate to the task of running the empire it almost accidentally acquired after the Punic Wars. Rather than extending a republican form of government to conquered territories, it tended to send provincial governors who acted as absolute rulers. In certain ways, the necessity of administering an empire led to the collapse of the Republic and the beginning of monarchial rule. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.