Skip to main content

How is Madame Loisel responsible for her own suffering in "The Necklace"?

Madame Loisel is responsible for her own suffering because she wanted more than she had, and she wanted people to believe she had more.  If she had not been putting on airs, she would not have gone into debt.  If she had told the truth, she would not have gone into debt.


Madame Loisel’s first problem was that she was not satisfied with her lot in life.  Few people are, I guess, but she seemed to feel that she was born into the wrong social class.  She deserved more than she got.  Even when her husband tried to help her feel better by getting her invited to a party for the rich, she was upset because she didn’t have the right dress or jewels.  She wasted all of the money they had saved on a dress, and borrowed a jewel from a friend.



She had no clothes, no jewels, nothing. And these were the only things she loved; she felt that she was made for them. She had longed so eagerly to charm, to be desired, to be wildly attractive and sought after.



At the ball, people do pay attention to her.  She loves it.  Then I suppose you could say she gets an attack of irony, or karma.  She loses the necklace.  Instead of owning up to it, she pretends that nothing happened but a broken clasp.  Then she replaces it with another necklace like nothing happened.  The problem is that this was a diamond necklace, and the Loisels can’t afford it, so they go into debt.


Years later, Madame Loisel runs into her friend and finds out the necklace she lost was fake.



"Oh, my poor Mathilde! But mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs! . . . "



By this time, Madame Loisel looks so old and haggard her friend barely recognizes her.  She has had to fire all of her servants and work hard to pay off the debt.  Whatever beauty and social standing she had is gone.  It’s sad, but it is all her own fault because if she had told the truth they would have just had a good laugh and gone on with their lives.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...
Post a Comment
Read more