Skip to main content

Evaluate Chaucer's thought of, "If gold ruste, what shall iren doo?" with reference to his Church orders.

This quote can be found in the General Prologue of Geoffrey Chaucer's "The Canterbury Tales." It is used when describing a Person of a Town, who is surprisingly a good and learned man. He preached the gospel devoutly, and was a shepherd to his people. His Church office was that of a clerk, which meant he was in charge of the documentation of his parish. He led by example, and believed that other church figures should do the same. However, Chaucer declares that the Person often used the phrase, "if gold ruste, what shall iren do?" (line 502). The phrase is immediately followed by explanation: "For if a preest be foul, on whom we truste, No wonder is a lewed man to ruste" (lines 503-504). The Person means that if even the servants of God, the people who hold Church office, are corrupt, then the average man cannot be expected to act any better. The phrase is a metaphor, with the gold being the church figures, the iron being the average man, and rust being corruptness. Because the Person believed in leading by example, it can be assumed that the Person would prefer if people in Church offices were gold without rust, so that even the average person could avoid rust, too. Chaucer narrates this section of the General Prologue in positive favour of the Person of the Town for his wisdom and goodness, exampled in a way by this famous quote.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.