Skip to main content

What effect did totalitarianism have on the Second World War?

The rise of totalitarian governments, particularly that of Nazi Germany, was a major cause of World War II. The reason for this is that Adolf Hitler, the German dictator, based his power upon promises of restoring German greatness, and for him, this always entailed, as he made clear in his speeches, German conquest of Europe. Hitler's aggressions, then, which began by his flouting the rules of the Treaty of Versailles by sending German troops into the Rhineland in 1936, were fundamental to Nazi totalitarianism, and they eventually led to the outbreak of war in the fall of 1939. Beyond that, the fact that totalitarian leaders were able to almost totally mobilize their peoples for war, along with the use of new technologies, resulted in unimaginable casualties. Stalin's Soviet Union, for example, suffered nearly 27 million people killed, both victims of Hitler's invading armies and the utter and total sacrifice that Stalin required of his armies and his people. Indeed, these casualty numbers include many people murdered by Stalin's police and others. So totalitarianism contributed to the outbreak of the war and to its incredible cost.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.