Skip to main content

How much time elapses in Salvation by Langston Hughes and why is this important to the effect?

I just answered a question concerning "Salvation" that might be helpful to this question.


With regards to how time passes, the essay begins a few weeks before an important revival meeting at Hughes's aunt's church. The build-up for this revival meeting over the next few weeks happens quickly, over the course of a single paragraph. Then, Hughes spends the rest of this essay describing this single revival meeting, which most likely lasts several hours (at one point Hughes says, "Now it was really getting late. I began to be ashamed of myself, holding everyone up so long.") The fact that most of the essay revolves around a single event in time tells us that this event was an important milestone in Hughes's life.


It's important to note that the essay is written from the point-of-view of Hughes as an almost 13-year-old boy, a child on the brink of adulthood. Thus, while the essay mainly covers a single event lasting just a few hours, Hughes's child speaker ages dramatically in the essay. At the end, Hughes writes, "Now I didn’t believe there was a Jesus any more, since he didn’t come to help me." The essay represents a moment of enlightenment and disillusionment for the speaker. The fact that the essay covers such a short period of time is shows us how monumental this event was in Hughes's life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more