The unnamed narrator is in many ways the opposite of Bartleby: an optimistic and stable man, the lawyer seems to be a completely devoted contributor to both society and the economy in general. Thus, it's possible Melville chose the lawyer as his narrator to more dramatically emphasize Bartleby's stagnation and listlessness. Unlike his employer, Bartleby seems completely apathetic about his work, and seems to have no faith in the occupation that he has chosen for himself. Indeed, Bartleby seems to be simply going through the motions in life and is uninterested in his work. As such, the lawyer's optimistic work ethic and contribution to the work force is, in some sense, deconstructed. Therefore, we can hypothesize that Melville chose a stable and normal lawyer as his narrator in order to call into question, through Bartleby's apathy, the robust American work ethic represented by this lawyer.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment