Skip to main content

What is the reaction of iodine when Benedict's test is positive?

Benedict’s test is used to detect the presence of reducing sugars. All monosaccharides and some disaccharides such as lactose and maltose are called reducing sugars. When Benedict’s test is positive, an orange-red precipitate forms when the Benedict’s reagent is added to a solution contain reducing sugar.


The iodine test is a chemical test for starch. When iodine solution which is red is added to starch it turns blue/black in colour.


If according to your question, the Benedict’s test is positive, it implies that the solution contains a reducing sugar, in which case an orange-red precipitate forms when the Benedict’s reagent is added. Iodine does not react with reducing sugars and so when iodine (which is red) is added to such a solution, no colour change will be observed unless starch is present, in which case a blue/black colour change gives away the presence of starch. See the table at the end of this article.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more