Skip to main content

expression choice - Difference between "What time do you come to class every day?" and "What time do you go to class every day?"


Could someone please explain me the difference between the following?




  1. A: What time do you go to class every day? B: At 8:00

  2. A: What time do you come to class every day? B: At 8:00



I understand them as



In 1, B leaves home at 8:00 to go to class every day.
In 2, B arrives at class at 8:00 every day.



Do I understand them correctly?



Answer



No. It is nothing to do with the difference between leaving and arriving.


"Go" and "come" are used consistently in English, though the difference is sometimes difficult to explain.


"Come" is used when the speaker associates themselves with the destination: usually because that is where they are when they speak ("Please come to my office now."); sometimes because that is where they will be when the person arrives ("Will you come to the party tonight? We're going to be in the Starlight Ballroom."); sometimes because it is a place associated with the speaker even though they are not themselves going to be there at the relevant time ("I'm away this week, but you can come to our offices any time").


So "come to class" has the implication that the speaker will be at the class, or that it is a class that the speaker has an involvement in. "Go to class" does not have that implication. That is all.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more