Skip to main content

pronouns - Is it appropriate to refer to a person of unknown sex by "it"?


I would like to treat a user as a non-gender noun and refer to it with the gender-neutral pronoun, it. E.g.,



The user defines two variables, x and y. It then multiplies each variable by a prime number.



However, on Wikipedia I found this:



The word "it", however, has an extremely impersonal connotation, even offensive, in common usage and is rarely used in English to refer to an unspecified human being or person of unknown gender. This is because the word "it" connotes that the person being specified is inferior to a person or is an object.



Is to appropriate to refer to a person of unknown sex as it?


Should I rephrase my sentence as follows:



The user defines two variables, x and y. The user then multiplies each variable by a prime number.




Answer



It is pejorative with reference to living beings, esp. social beings. It refers to an inanimate object.


Stay with the user throughout, for consistency, for political correctness and for consideration towards the reader.


Next, rephrase sentences to circumvent the issue of direct reference:



The user defines two variables, x and y, and then multiplies each variable by a prime number.



should do.


True, earlier some people used to refer to a newborn as it, but that is out of ignorance of the niceties. Never done in formal writing.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.