Skip to main content

How do both Hamlet and Don Quixote act as soldiers? What does that tell us about heroism?

Both Hamlet and Don Quixote are used to critique "heroism" that relies too heavily on violence.


Hamlet is pointedly a scholar, not a soldier, despite being the son of a king. When confronted with the warrior's honor code that insists he murder his uncle to avenge his father's death, Hamlet hesitates. While many have seen this as a character flaw of Hamlet's, critics such as Rene Girard in his essay "Hamlet's Dull Revenge" understand Shakespeare to be critiquing an ethic that creates a continuous cycle of bloodshed and revenge.


Hamlet is a sympathetic character, deeply anguished about doing the right thing, to the point of contemplating suicide as a release from his dilemma, but he is no warrior. Thinking, not fighting, is his chief weapon, and he does nothing to prevent Fortinbras from invading his kingdom (arguably, this is his uncle's problem, but as stepson of the king, he might have been created with a more soldierly aspect). By casting this prince as contemplative rather than a warrior and having him raise questions about life and death, Shakespeare critiques unthinking violence and revenge. Laertes' more unreflective and bloodthirsty approach to vengeance, in contrast, is exploited by Claudius for his own purposes, and we are meant to mourn, not celebrate, the pile-up of dead bodies at the play's end. 


Likewise, Don Quixote functions as a critique of heroism. Don Quixote has gone "mad" (this early novel questions madness and sanity) from reading chivalric romances and believes he is a knight errant. He sallies forth to right wrongs, but instead causes nothing but trouble with his would-be heroism, and often, comic book style, ends up brutally beaten before springing back to life and moving onward. He intervenes with a farmer who is beating a worker, only causing a more violent beating and trouble for the worker after he leaves, and he tilts at windmills, thinking they are giants, only causing pain to himself. In fact, the phrase "tilting at windmills" has come to represent misplaced heroism or idealism, or a misapplied use of force for no good end.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more