Skip to main content

What is the difference between a lymphocyte and a phagocyte?

Both lymphocytes and phagocytes are components of a body's immune system and serve to protect the body from harmful components.


Lymphocytes are produced by lymph nodes and are a component of the body's immune system. There are three types of lymphocytes: thymus cells (T cells), bone marrow cells (B cells), and natural killer cells (NK cells), all of which have unique functions. T cells guide a body's immune response at a cellular level whereas B cells direct immune responses through antibodies. In contrast, natural killer cells expunge harmful material.


Phagocytes, also part of the body's immune system, engulf harmful material in the body. These cells follow chemical signals in the body to areas with dying cells, foreign particles, or bacteria and ingest the harmful components. Some phagocytes even work with lymphocytes, specifically natural killer cells, to destroy harmful components.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.