Boo Radley hid gifts for Scout and Jem in the knot-hole of a large, old tree in front of the Radley house. The first gifts the siblings found in the tree were two sticks of gum. Jem cautioned Scout against chewing the gum. He was worried that it might be poisoned. Later, the children found a ball of twine. They left the twine for days, but it remained in the knot-hole. They decided that the gifts were there for them. They eagerly looked forward to finding new items in the knot-hole. Another time, they "pulled out two small images carved in soap. One was the figure of a boy, the other wore a crude dress" (To Kill a Mockingbird, Chapter 7). They also found an old spelling medal and a broken pocket watch on a chain. Scout and Jem were fascinated by the gifts. They even wrote a letter to their mysterious gift-giver. The knot-hole was the place where they always found gifts. They were devastated when Mr. Radley filled the knot-hole with cement.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment