Romeo is frequently sad because he is a hopeless romantic. He is not hopeless in the sense that he is without hope, however, for he does, in fact, hope for the best in his tragic situation. Romeo is hopeless because involves himself in a hopeless situation. Since the Montagues and Capulets are families with a blood feud, his marriage to Juliet would likely never be accepted. Both Romeo and Juliet realize this unfortunate fact, and though they try, Shakespeare shows that they cannot escape fate. Perhaps Romeo is always sad because deep down, he realizes this fate, but chooses to pursue love instead of preserving his personal safety. With the knowledge that his marriage to Juliet would never be accepted, it makes sense Romeo would be sad since he reveals that his love for Juliet is more important to him than anything else.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment