Skip to main content

Read chapter three of The Metamorphosis. What questions arise as you go?

Below you will find my annotations of Chapter Three of The Metamorphosis, including comments and/or questions for each page you asked for:


Page 449: If the apple which has become lodged in Gregor's back makes Gregor's family recall that he is one of them, not an "enemy," and owed "nothing but patience" as a result of duty, why does no one bother to remove the apple for him? This seems like it would be the first and foremost act of "patience" to perform for a family member--to alleviate his pain. 


Page 450: My comment here is that Gregor's father seems to be a greater source of trouble for the family than Gregor himself. His lack of attention to his own hygiene and appearance, his insistence upon falling asleep in his chair, and his theatrics about being helped off to his room seem to make him sound like a giant vermin his own self. 


Page 451: Why does Gregor maintain the meticulous attitudes of his previous human form now that he is an insect/vermin? Wouldn't he naturally adapt to these dirty conditions, as actual insects and vermin do?


Page 452: The text says that the charwoman had a frame which "enabled her to survive the worst a long life could offer" and that she "by no means recoiled from Gregor." What kind of incidences would be so bad in her life that she would not take fright in seeing an enormous insect in a man's room? 


Page 453: My comment here is that it is interesting how Gregor's attention to detail seems to be heightened by his transformation. He notices small things which he might not have before: how the lodgers bend over their food before consuming it, the sound of their teeth while chewing and the implications this has, the presence of the violin-playing, etc.


Page 454: Is it really the artistic satisfaction of hearing beautiful music that Gregor craves, or is it the company of his sister? If it's the latter, why this sudden change when Gregor had just proclaimed his "surprise at his growing lack of consideration for the others"?


Page 455: I find this particular page bizarre. It's clear that the lodgers are manipulating the discovery of Gregor into a situation in which they can financially take advantage of Gregor's family. They don't strike me as the most cleanly or "proper" bunch, which would explain why their initial reaction to seeing him would be fascination rather than disgust. Gregor's sister's impulse to go make their beds and tidy their rooms seems silly given this knowledge; that kind of action isn't going to calm these men down.


Page 456: Gregor's family seems to believe that he can't understand them, although he can. My question for Gregor would be: why don't you make greater efforts to facilitate some sort of communication between you and your family, no matter how difficult or impossible the task seems? 


Page 457: Why does the charwoman manage to "[credit] [Gregor] with every kind of intelligence" when--as I just mentioned--his own family can't recognize him as a thinking, feeling being? 


Page 458: Do any of Gregor's family members experience true grief at his passing? Do they recognize that Gregor had internalized their death wish for him?


Page 459: Another point of interest here to me is the fact that the lodgers are ordered to leave immediately after Gregor's death. It seems like they themselves were a kind of vermin--predatory men looking to profit off the family's unfortunate circumstances by any means necessary. 


Page 460: Why does the conclusion of the novella place such emphasis on Gregor's sister's body and her marriageability?  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more