Skip to main content

How can I describe a time when I have observed the transmission, reflection, or absorption of a sound?

There are many forms of energy. Several examples that are concretely observable by human senses include heat, light, and sound. According to laws of physics, energy cannot be created or destroyed. It merely changes forms as it interacts with or transfers to other matter. Sound, in particular, travels in waves but behaves differently depending on the medium it is passing through.


Sound traveling through a medium in a liquid state that is influenced by movement, such as water in a swimming pool, it can be refracted. Have you ever listened to someone speak while you are under water? Molecules of matter in the liquid phase shift and move, influencing sound wave energy in inconsistent but predictable ways. When a person listens to someone speak through water, a portion of the vocal sound waves emitted are refracted in the form of dispersion. Not all of the sound waves reach your ear drum because they have been absorbed. Their voice will also sound distorted, similar to an echo. Part of the sound waves reach your eardrum after reflecting or bouncing.


Unlike water in a liquid state, solid ice consistently absorbs sound. Water molecules move slowly and are more densely packed. This results in ice being a poor conductor for the transmission of wave forms of energy. Snow is precipitation in the form of ice molecules, which absorb sound. If walking on a snowy day seems quieter than others, it is. This is because some of the sound of your footsteps is absorbed by the snow.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more