Skip to main content

Why does the monster argue that Frankenstein has shirked his responsibility as father/creator and that he should pay for this rejection in Mary...

A dominant theme in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is responsibility for one's actions, especially responsibility for what one creates. The creature sees that Frankenstein has behaved recklessly by bringing him to life and carelessly by rejecting and abandoning him, actions that have caused him to suffer immensely. Because of his suffering, the creature feels Frankenstein has a moral obligation to take responsibility for the creature's suffering and to ease his suffering, just a little, by creating him a mate.

In chapter 11, the creature begins relaying to Frankenstein his story of suffering. He starts by explaining he had developed his own education by observing the De Laceys in their cottage. While living in the De Laceys' shed, he discovered a leather trunk full of clothes and books, and he began reading the books. One of the books he read was Milton's Paradise Lost. From the book, the creature learned about how God created Adam to be a "perfect creature, happy and prosperous" (Ch. 15). The creature further learned that God protected Adam and educated him through conversation. The creature sees that Frankenstein has behaved in the exact opposite way as God. Instead of creating something that is beautiful and in Frankenstein's own image, just as Frankenstein and all mankind are in God's image, Frankenstein has instead created something so hideous all of mankind is revolted by the creature, terrified of the creature, and desiring to kill the creature. Also contrary to God, Frankenstein himself was so revolted by his own creation that Frankenstein ran from his creation then forgot all about him, leaving him to suffer and fend for himself all on his own. The creature explains that because he was abandoned, misjudged, and hurt so frequently, he was filled with rage and a desire for revenge, a desire that led him to murder Frankenstein's young brother William and frame Justine for the murder. Though the creature has committed murder, he sees himself as ultimately innocent because he sees Frankenstein as being to blame for the rage in his heart, rage that has stemmed from immense suffering. We see the creature's view of his own innocence when, while imploring Frankenstein to have compassion for him and hear his story, the creature says of himself, "Frankenstein, I was benevolent; my soul glowed with love and humanity; but am I not alone, miserably alone?" (Ch. 10). We further see Frankenstein's view of his own innocence when he compares himself to Satan, the fallen angel from Paradise Lost, when he should have been like Adam to Frankenstein:



I ought to be thy Adam, but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed. (Ch. 10)



When the creature speaks the phrase "no misdeed," we see that he is declaring his innocence. Since the creature sees Frankenstein as to blame for the creature's loss of benevolence towards mankind, the creature feels it is only right that Frankenstein make him a companion so that he might, for once, "feel gratitude toward [Frankenstein] for one benefit!" (Ch. 17).

Frankenstein is at first repulsed by the idea of a second creature, yet he feels compassion for his creature and agrees that, as the creator, it is his responsibility to provide for the creature as much as possible, just as God provided for Adam in Paradise Lost.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more