Skip to main content

In Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, how is Romeo ambivalent towards love?

Before we answer this question regarding the protagonist of William Shakespeare's tragedy Romeo and Juliet, it's important to define the term "ambivalent."


Many people consider it interchangeable with "ambiguous", which means "open to multiple interpretations" or "difficult to define." However, "ambivalent" is not a neutral term. Instead, it means "unable to make a choice, caused by the conflicting desire to do, say, or believe two opposite things." 


With that in mind, we can now turn to Romeo's ambivalence. One side of Romeo's internal conflict regarding love is extremely negative. This side is primarily influenced by his unrequited love for Rosaline, which dictates many of Romeo's actions and choices at the beginning of the play. This experience leads Romeo to feel strongly against love and its ability to make a man feel happy. 


However, once he meets Juliet, a conflicting perspective on love is introduced to Romeo's point of view. Because his relationship with Juliet is in fact "successful" (please take that description with all of the grains of salt), he now perceives love as integral to happiness. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more