Lincoln's greatest fear politically was that he would be the last president of the United States of America--that the Confederate states would win their war for secession and that the Republic would collapse into a collection of micro-states. Lincoln was willing to bend the rules of the Constitution--he suspended the writ of habeas corpus several times during the war to persecute Rebel sympathizers. He authorized his armies to wage war against civilians in order to bring the states in rebellion under control. He ignored pleas from his own party to free the slaves outright--the amendment which freed the slaves was only ratified upon his death in 1865. Lincoln knew that he was not politically popular and did little to grow his party base or to make himself more re-electable in 1864; rather, he acted according to his conscience and kept the nation together as he swore to do when he took the oath of office.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment