Skip to main content

How does American realist Kate Chopin depict upper-class marriage at the turn of the 19th century? What does she suggest about relationships...

Kate Chopin depicts upper class marriage at the turn of the 19th century as confining and largely loveless.  When Mrs. Mallard is told her husband dies, the impression given to the reader is that she is grief-stricken.



“She wept at once, with sudden, wild abandonment."



When she goes upstairs, however, she undergoes a change.  Suddenly, the reader realizes that on some level she is glad her husband has died. Mrs. Mallard feels free. 



“There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature."



This quotation shows that Mrs. Mallard feels oppressed in her marriage—as if a powerful will is bending hers.   Her realization that she will no longer have to live under her husband’s rule makes her feel free. 



“But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely. And she opened and spread her arms out to them in welcome." 



Mrs. Mallard reflects that her husband had always been loving toward her and that she had loved him—sometimes.



“And yet she had loved him—sometimes. Often she had not."



Chopin shows the reader the tradition of upper class arranged marriages of convenience.  Women had little choice and even less freedom.  Mrs. Mallard is overjoyed at the idea of freedom for the rest of her life, which she now hopes will be long. 



“It was only yesterday she had thought with a shudder that life might be long."



As a result, the shock of seeing him again kills her—a fact of which her husband is blissfully unaware. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.