Skip to main content

In The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, identify eight scenes that were similar to the Holocaust time period.

I think that one of the most effective scenes to mirror the Holocaust was where Bruno, Shmuel, and other people were herded into the gas chamber.  The panic that the scene captured, in terms of the people being taken inside and then when the doors closed was quite realistic.   The gas chamber was one of the most "efficient" ways that the Nazis killed their prisoners.  One detail that the film captures was how there was a panic-filled set of minutes between the locking of the door and the distribution of the pellets that would set off the reaction to release the fatal gas.  The way the film captured that sad moment was very reflective of the Holocaust time period.


Kotler abusing Pavel and Shmuel are two scenes that reflect the cruelty of the Nazis during the Holocaust.  Pavel is an old man and Shmuel is a child. However, Kotler does not miss the chance to physically and emotionally abuse them.  The barbarism he displays is effective in recreating the terror that was the Holocaust.  Both Pavel and Shmuel did not do anything wrong, and yet they were the recipients of brutality, a reality that many experienced in the Holocaust.


Shmuel's small hands are shown in unflinching detail. This reflects how many victims of the Nazis were starved.  The small fingers mirror his emaciated body, something that brings to light the thinness of the victims. When Allied forces liberated the camps, the sight of the gaunt bodies made them think they were witnessing the walking dead, something that the scene with Shmuel's tiny fingers conveys quite well.


From the Nazi side of reality, the dinner scene conversation between Kotler and Bruno's father shows how the Nazis compartmentalized what they were doing. The conversation that takes place does not acknowledge the moral or ethical implications behind being the architects of millions of deaths.  Rather, their conversation is very banal. It is everyday conversation about their own lives, something that seems to go against the idea that a massive scale of death and suffering is taking place outside. There was a compartmentalization to many Nazis. What they did at "work" was never brought home.  They were model husbands, wives, and parents at home, even though they spent their days at work committing atrocities to husbands, wives, and parents.  


The fence that divides Bruno and Shmuel is another effective scene.  The barbed wire was something that many survivors of the Holocaust never forgot.  The world outside that fence was so much happier, so much better, than what was in it.  A simple change in placement in relation to that fence altered so much, and the fact that Bruno is one side while Shmuel is on the other communicates that quite well.


Herr Liszt's teachings were another historically valid element in the film.  The Nazis used education as propaganda to indoctrinate millions of German children to embrace antisemitism and Germany's perceived greatness.  This use of propaganda helped to ensure the obedience and conformity which facilitated the millions of deaths within the Holocaust.


Finally, the smoke from the chimneys alerts Bruno's mother what is taking place at Auschwitz.  This is historically accurate because the massive scale of death was communicated through the crematorium's smoke.  Upon seeing Auschwitz for the first time, Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel writes, "Never shall I forget that smoke."  This conveys how intense and dominant the smoke was, the very same smoke that causes Bruno's mother to speak to her husband with condemnation and shame at the role he is playing in one of history's saddest chapters.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...