Skip to main content

How important is Peter Quince to Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream? What might not happen without him?

At first glance, Peter Quince is not a central character in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream. After all, he's not part of the Athenian relationship debacle, nor does he have a central comedic role like Bottom. That said, Quince is more important than many readers might think, as he's the director and writer of the play-within-a-play, the centerpiece of Act 5. Indeed, it seems that Quince is in charge of the bulk of the rude mechanicals' theatrical exercise, as he assigns the roles and generally seems to manage the other tradesmen's energies (especially Bottom's). The play becomes an important comedic device, as it provides not only a hilarious conclusion to an already uproarious play, but it also becomes a brilliant commentary on the nature of theatrical narrative and artistic representation. Since the play-within-a-play would not happen without Quince's organizational efforts, and since this play becomes a vital aspect of A Midsummer Night's Dream, Quince actually proves to be an essential element of the narrative, even if he isn't one of the central characters. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.