Skip to main content

I need help analyzing Hill's poem "Genesis."

The beginning of your analysis of Geoffrey Hill's poem "Genesis" should focus on the title. The title is an obvious allusion to the Biblical book of Genesis. Two aspects of the Biblical story are important. The first is the account of God's creation of the world, including the physical earth (both land and water) and the animals and humans that populate it. The second important aspect of the Genesis story for the poem is the concept of Adamic naming, in which Adam gives names to the creatures populating the world. Hill here is using a common trope in which the poet's act of naming in the poem is seen as parallel to Adamic naming. Just as God's creatures are in the image of God, so Adamic naming is an image of the act of creation. The poem is structured to follow the six days of Creation as set forth in the Biblical story.


On a formal level, you should examine the meter of the poem. Although the base meter is iambic tetrameter, there are several rhythmical variations in the lines. Although most lines of the poem are rhymed, there are several instances of variation in rhyme pattern and use of slant or off-rhymes you could discuss. The first couplet, for example,  uses slightly different vowel sounds, but the subsequent quatrain uses perfectly regular rhyme sounds. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.