Skip to main content

In The Witch of Blackbird Pond, what does Nat do to William's house?

Nat and his friends illuminated William’s house with jack-o-lanterns because he was jealous. 


Kit’s uncle tells her that William has been the victim of an “insulting prank.”  He tells her that William’s house has been “illuminated.” 



"You mean they burned it down?" gasped Rachel.


"No. They well might have. They put lanterns in the window frames that are waiting for the new panes. Lanterns made out of pumpkin heads, with candles inside, and unholy faces cut in the sides to show the light." (Ch. 16) 



Kit finds this funny, even though the Puritans think it is horrible.  Her uncle calls jack-o-lanters the “devil's invention.” The three “ringleaders” are being held in a shed and will be put in the stocks on Lecture Day. 


Kit goes into town to see Nat in the stocks.  He tells her to get away, not wanting the townspeople to see her talking to him.  She doesn’t care. 



Deliberately Kit stepped closer. She marked the way the tight boards were chafing the hard brown wrists. "This is horrible, Nat!" she burst out. "I can't bear to see you in this hateful thing!" (Ch. 16) 



The incident is a turning point for Kit. She realizes that it is Nat that she cares about, and Nat cares about her.  He vandalized William Ashby’s house out of jealousy.  Nat realized that Kit did not belong with a man like William.  Beyond that, he had loved her from the beginning. 


Nat’s relationship with Kit was a complex one.  He was a free spirit, like she was.  He called her a tropical bird.  Kit married Nat, and was able to live an unconventional life but one that was more suited to her personality than the straight-laced Puritan lifestyle that William would have given her.  William might have been rich, but Nat was adventurous and that was what Kit preferred.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more