Skip to main content

based on the Preface, Introduction and chapters 1-4 of Ian Haney López's Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented...

The term "dog whistle" is used in Mr. Lopez's book as a metaphor for saying one thing that is audible to everyone, but in reality suggesting an unheard castigation of a racial group which those particularly addressed will hear. During his tenure as president, Lopez contends, President Ronald Reagan employed this strategy of "dog whistle politics" using such terms as "welfare queens," "strapping young bucks," and "states' rights." 


In his effort to reduce federal spending, President Reagan sought to trim down certain government programs such as the welfare programs using similar methods that he had successfully employed as governor of California. One effort that Reagan made was that of seeking to eliminate fraud that existed in this program. When he spoke on this topic, Reagan employed what Lopez terms "dog whistle politics." For, he spoke during his campaign in 1980 of "welfare queens" who abused the system so much that they were driving Cadillacs and wearing fur coats. [This is a rather generalized reference to women such as African-American Linda Taylor who used 80 aliases and amassed a tax-free $150,000 a year.] Less subtly, he criticized the amount afforded people on food stamps when he alluded to "strapping young bucks" who purchased T-bone steaks with their food stamps. 


According to Lopez, with these "dog whistles" Reagan tapped into the same technique used by George Wallace and Richard Nixon. In fact, like Wallace, Lopez further contends, Reagan spoke of states' rights with more than its denotation evident in his phrase. While Reagan did believe in reducing the power of the federal government and restoring more autonomy to the individual states, it could not be overlooked that he used this phrase when he addressed a crowd during his 1980 presidential campaign in Neshoba County, Mississippi, which is only seven miles from Philadelphia, Mississippi, a town associated with the murder of civil rights workers in 1964.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more