Skip to main content

What are Friar Laurence's motives and what does he love in Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet?

When Friar Laurence says goodbye to Romeo just before Romeo leaves for his exile in Mantua, Friar Laurence says he believes the day will come when they can "reconcile [Romeo and Juliet's] friends," by which he means they can end the feud between the Montagues and the Capulets (3.3.161).  Perhaps this desire to end the ancient grudge that results in so much violence, compounded with the Friar's honest desire to see these young lovers safe and happy, motivates Friar Laurence's decision to help Romeo and Juliet. Further, when Friar Laurence addresses the Capulets on the morning they find Juliet "dead," he seems to chastise them by saying, "'twas your heaven she should be advanced." He to the fact that Juliet's parents pushed her to marry the County Paris, who they saw as a very advantageous match because he is a relation of the Prince. Had Juliet's parents cared more about her happiness or ending the feud, Friar Laurence argues, none of them would be in this position. Thus, the Friar might also be motivated by a dislike of the Capulets' parenting as well.


In terms of what he loves, Friar Laurence seems to love peace. He seems to love Romeo and Juliet, as he acts in what he believes is their best interest. He does not want Romeo to be unhappy, so he devises a way for him to marry Juliet. He does not want Juliet to kill herself, so he devises a way for her to escape her betrothal to Paris and be with Romeo. Friar Laurence just wants peace between the families and for an end to violence and pain.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.