Skip to main content

What impact did Upton Sinclair's book The Jungle have on changing the way we look at the food industry?

This book had a profound impact on the food industry. While Sinclair wrote The Jungle in 1906 order to build public sympathy for the plight of oppressed workers, he happened to set his story amid the meatpacking plants of Chicago. As a result, the novel set off a firestorm of protest about the lack of sanitation in the food industry. In the novel, anything, including human bodies, that happened to fall into the food vats were ground up and canned. At this time, there were no government inspections of meat plants and no real way for people to know what they were buying.


As a result of people's worry and revulsion after reading the book, which was a bestseller, meat sales fell. In 1906, the government passed the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Meat Inspection Act to reassure the public that they were buying what they thought they were buying. Government inspectors could now enter meat packing plants, inspect what was going on, and certify the products as safe for consumption. Sinclair famously said that he aimed for people's hearts in the novel and ended up hitting their stomachs.


Since the novel's publication, the public has supported regulation of the food industry so that people know what they are eating. Never again would the public trust the food industry to regulate itself wholly without oversight. This interest in food industry supervision has continued, so that now companies must list the ingredients in food and other nutritional information on food packaging.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more