Skip to main content

Does Walt Whitman's poem "O Captain! My Captain!" teach anything or have any controlling ideas about loss?

A useful way to think about poetry is that poems make observations about the human experience. "O Captain! My Captain!" was inspired by the death of Abraham Lincoln, a man Walt Whitman greatly admired; in fact, the poem is an elegy, a formal poem of mourning.


Because Whitman does not name Lincoln as the subject of the poem, it can be read as a work that captures the emotions surrounding the death of a greatly admired or respected leader. The speaker exhorts his captain to rise from the deck where he has fallen dead; he wants the captain to be able to enjoy the rewards of the successful journey they took together and join the people who are gathered to celebrate. He implores the captain to rise and receive the adulation of the crowds gathered in his honor. At the end of the poem, the speaker sorrowfully observes that his captain cannot answer and has not lived to share in the triumph.


Whitman's controlling idea is the tragedy inherent in the death of a leader who doesn't survive to witness his legacy. Though in this case he means, particularly, the president who has led the reunification of the United States in the Civil War, the poem's lament is generally for anyone who does not live to see the fruits of his or her labor.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.