Skip to main content

How does Shakespeare present Lady Macbeth in Act 1, scene 5?

In this scene, Shakespeare presents Lady Macbeth as a manipulative, ruthless, and diabolical woman. When she reads Macbeth's letter that acquaints her with his news from the Weird Sisters, she becomes anxious for him to come home. She believes that he is too good and kind to "catch the nearest way" to the throne, and she wants to "pour [her] spirits into [his] ear" and make him see her way.


She also prays to murderous spirits to come to her and remove any sense of remorse or compassion from her and fill her up, from her toes to the top of her head, with ruthlessness and strength so that she can go forward with the evil plans she's already making. Although she desires to be completely remorseless and without feeling, the fact that she has to pray for it makes it seem as though this is not really her natural character. She is ambitious, clearly, but if she were already totally ruthless, she wouldn't have to pray for assistance to be ruthless. Therefore, Shakespeare presents her as manipulative and ambitious, someone who wants to be tougher than, perhaps, she really is.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more