Skip to main content

How do you experience Mcdonaldization in your everyday life?

The idea of McDonaldization is the idea that society as a whole is becoming more like a fast-food restaurant. That is, it is becoming as efficient as possible and is giving up on the idea of subjective quality in favor of objective quantity.  It is trying to turn out as much of a given thing as efficiently as it can, regardless of ideas like quality or diversity in tastes.


How might you see this in your life?  Let me suggest two ways in which you have probably encountered McDonaldization in your life.  First, you have surely encountered automated processes in various parts of your life. Have you ever been to a store where you checked out your purchases through an automated, self-check system? Have you ever tried to call for customer service only to get an automated voice telling you to press certain numbers on your phone depending on what you want?  If so, you were experiencing McDonaldization because one aspect of this trend is the trend toward control of the workforce through the use of machines and lower-skilled workers who do not get to make decisions.


A second way you have probably experienced McDonaldization is in your education.  McDonaldization stresses “calculability.”  It wants to make sure that we have easy ways of calculating what we are creating so we can “know” how well we are doing.  Therefore, we have lots of standardized tests.  These tests purport to show how well students are learning, but it is plausible to argue that they do not do a very good job.  They do not really measure all the various ways in which students can learn.  Instead, they provide us with an easy way to quantify learning, even if we are unable to determine the true quality of that learning.


These are two ways in which you, personally, have probably encountered McDonaldization in your own life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.