Skip to main content

How does Faulkner use the physical descriptions of Miss Emily, her conflict with the townspeople, and the revelation of the story's final paragraph...

These type of descriptions that you are asking about fall under two categories:


Direct characterization and Indirect characterization.


Faulkner uses both cleverly by juxtaposing the direct description of Emily, in contrast with her actions. He does this primarily to deflect the attention of the reader and, ultimately, cause the big shock at the end.


Direct characterization happens when Faulkner gives us a step by step account of what Emily really looks like, for example: 



[Emily is a] small, fat woman in black[...] Her skeleton was small and spare; [...]She looked bloated, like a body long submerged in motionless water, and of that pallid hue. Her eyes, lost in the fatty ridges of her face, looked like two small pieces of coal ...



This direct characterization of Emily is meant to show that the woman whom so many in Jefferson County feared, and thought to be so enigmatic, is merely a short, plump lady of old age whose demeanor may seem unhappy, but is otherwise harmless. 


It is almost as if Faulkner is asking the townsfolk "What is wrong with all of you?" "Can't you see that this little lady is incapable of causing harm?" We know that he does this on purpose, as Emily's actions will proof to be anything but harmless. 


Faulkner therefore uses indirect characterization to contrast the image of this plump, old lady against the absolutely strange things that she does. This builds up for the ending to come ore dramatically.


An example is the time when Emily refuses to give up the body of her dead father for burial because she was in denial that he was dead. Another example is when Emily suddenly starts dating a drifter from the North, Homer Barron, who is the last individual anyone would have ever thought that Emily would be interested in dating. A third example is when Emily looks out the window as the people from town throw limestone at the surroundings of her house, given that a stench that came from the house was so bad that the residents were bothered by it.


All of these are the actions of someone who is quite strange; someone who does not seem to be congruent with one action and the next. This, when contrasted to the otherwise harmless look of Emily, gives the reader a sense that, with this lady, anything could happen. 


Finally, when the reveal that takes place in the end verifies the previous assumption. The reader realizes that, indeed, anything can happen with Emily. The revelation that Emily had lived with Homer's dead body, and that she is likely who may have killed him, makes the reader revert back to all the instances of direct and indirect characterization, in order to connect the dots and put all the details together. 


Therefore, Faulkner juxtaposes indirect and direct characterization as a way to show the contrast between what Emily looks like and how she behaves. This helps to foreshadow the big surprise that will come at the end of the story. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more