Skip to main content

What is the difference between oceanic and continental plates?

Earth has three layers: the uppermost crust, the middle mantle and the innermost core. The outer layer of Earth- the crust, can be classified as either continental crust or oceanic crust, depending upon whether it houses the continents or the oceans. The crust is divided into a number of fragments, each known as a tectonic plate. These plates are in constant motion.


Oceanic and continental plates commonly meet at convergent margins or boundaries. Oceanic plates are generally denser as compared to continental plates and slide under the lighter continental plates. This process is known as subduction. Since continental plates are lighter as compared to the oceanic plates, they are more buoyant. Continental plates are also older as compared to the oceanic plates. Another difference is the thickness of these plates. Continental plates are generally thicker as compared to the oceanic plates.


Hope this helps. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more