Skip to main content

In "The Luncheon" by Somerset Maugham, why couldn't the writer refuse to take the lady to Foyot's?

The author Somerset Maugham frequently wrote frankly autobiographical short stories. "The Luncheon" is one of them. He was conned into treating the woman to a luncheon at Foyot's in Paris because he was still quite young, was just getting started in his chosen career as a writer, and was concerned about good manners. He tells the reader why he couldn't refuse to take this pushy woman to Foyot's at her request. 



Foyot’s is a restaurant at which the French senators eat and it was so far beyond my means that I had never even thought of going there. But I was flattered and was too young to have learned to say no to a woman.



Maugham also believed her when she said:



"I never eat anything for luncheon."



One of the things that always seems to be present in Maugham's encounters with other people is his impeccable good manners. Throughout "The Luncheon," as the woman continues to pile up charges by ordering a la carte items, the author shows his inhibitions and self-restraint. He not only could not refrain from taking her to luncheon at Foyot's, but he could not bring himself to confess that he was afraid he wouldn't be able to pay the check. He had only anticipated spending fifteen francs at the famous restaurant.



I had eighty francs (gold francs) to last me the rest of the month and a decent luncheon should not cost more than fifteen. If I stopped drinking coffee for the next two weeks I could manage well enough.



His discomfiture keeps building as she keeps protesting, "I never eat anything for luncheon," and then requests another expensive item, including salmon, white wine, asparagus, and a fresh peach. The reader cannot help identifying with the young Maugham because fancy restaurants are pretty much the same everywhere. Some of the most expensive restaurants often do not even show prices on their menus. Foyot's manu at least showed prices, so the author was able to keep a running total on his mounting horror. It is when the woman orders the asparagus, which he knows to be "horribly expensive," without consulting the menu, that



Panic seized me. It was not a question now how much money I should have left over for the rest of the month, but whether I had enough to pay the bill. 



The whole story is built on irony. Maugham delighted in irony and had a keen, understated way of presenting it in his writings. He got tricked into spending all his money on this unattractive woman because of personal vanity, youthful inhibition, and uptight English good manners. His presentation of the woman is less vitriolic than it might have been because he includes his own faults in his memoir. The reader may be left wondering whether the author's guest understood that she was causing him to spend his entire bankroll on an expensive luncheon for her.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...