In Chapter 10, Bruno walks for almost an hour along the fence at Auschwitz and is just about to turn back and head home, when he sees a small dot appear in the distance. Initially, Bruno thinks that he may be looking at a mirage, but as he gradually walks closer, it is revealed that Bruno is actually staring at a young boy. Bruno had read enough books to realize that explorers could never be sure what they were going to find. He believes that there are essentially two categories of discovery. The first category belongs to things that explorers find interesting and are "waiting to be discovered," like the Americas. The second category belongs to things that explorers discover that are better left alone, like dead mice in the back of a cupboard. Bruno immediately puts the boy into the first category because the boy is simply sitting there, waiting to be discovered. Bruno politely introduces himself to the boy, and they have a pleasant conversation.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment