Skip to main content

Compare the comments Emerson makes about “Self-Reliance” with the comments Crevecoeur made in “What is an American?” How do these views of...

Emerson's "Self-Reliance" celebrates originality and nonconformity. He was opposed to people imitating others and famously wrote:



There is a time in every man's education when he arrives at the conviction that envy is ignorance; that imitation is suicide; that he must take himself for better, for worse, as his portion.



Emerson believed that true genius lay in following one's unique instincts and proclivities and not in copying others. 


Emerson also believed that Americans should not emulate Europeans but should instead cultivate what made them special. He wrote,



It is for want of self-culture that the superstition of Travelling, whose idols are Italy, England, Egypt, retains its fascination for all educated Americans. They who made England, Italy, or Greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth.



In other words, Emerson believed Americans should not try to imitate Europeans, as Europeans became great by fostering what was special within their own cultures. If Americans wanted to become great, Emerson thought, they should stay on their own land and cultivate what was uniquely American.


Similarly, Crevecoeur, a Frenchman, was in awe of the unique spirit that he felt animated America. He wrote of the visitor to American shores: "He is arrived on a new continent; a modern society offers itself to his contemptation, different from what he had hitherto seen." Crevecoeur noted the distinctiveness of American culture from European culture and celebrated this distinctiveness.


Crevecoeur, unlike Emerson, believed Americans had surpassed Europeans' greatness. He said of Americans:



Everything has tended to regenerate them; new laws, a new mode of living, a new social system; here they are become men: in Europe they were as so many useless plants, wanting vegitative mould, and refreshing showers; they withered, and were mowed down by want, hunger, and war.



While Emerson believed each person should cultivate greatness where he or she lived and that Americans and Europeans were each great in their own way, Crevecoeur believed Americans enjoyed a unique sense of freedom and liberty that was far superior to what Europeans had. 


Americans today do not tend to want to emulate Europeans and generally believe in what is called "American exceptionalism"--the idea that Americans have a unique sense of freedom and a particular destiny that is special in the world. Therefore, modern Americans' self-conceptions could be generalized as  similar to those of Emerson and Crevecoeur.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.