Skip to main content

For the circuit shown in the following diagram, what is the value of 1. current through 6 ohm resistor and 2. potential difference across 12 ohm...

Just to be clear: the resistors in segment A-B are 8 ohm and 3 ohm, while those in segment CD are 12 ohm and 6 ohm. 


We can use the concepts of series and parallel circuits to solve the problem. Let us assume that the current is I1 and I2 in segments A-B and C-D, respectively. For the circuit involving battery and segment A-B, we can write,


-4 + 8 I1 + 3 I1 = 0


Solving this equation, we get, I1 = 4/11 A


Similarly, for circuit involving battery and segment C-D, we can write,


-4 + 12 I2 + 6 I2 = 0


Solving this equation, we get I2 = 4/18 A


In a series circuit (such as in the segment C-D), the same current flows through each resistor, thus the current flowing through the 6 ohm resistor is 4/18 A or 0.22 A.


The potential difference across the 12 ohm resistor can be calculated as the product of current and resistance, that is


Potential difference = 12 I2 = 2.67 V.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...