Skip to main content

In what way do Macbeth's strengths contribute to his downfall?

Macbeth’s strengths include initiative and strength. He has courage on the battlefield, but since he wavers in his indecision on how much control he should have over his destiny in becoming king, this might not be seen as a strength off the battlefield, at least in the beginning. He is easily swayed by his wife. Yet in battle, he shows his courage and his loyalty to the king.


In the battle against the king of Norway, Macbeth’s strength makes him a hero. He carves his way through opposing forces. Malcom, Duncan’s son, reports of his valor and says he well deserves the name of “brave Macbeth.” He takes the initiative in leading the charge, rather than looking to someone else’s leadership. His confidence in his abilities aids him in not backing down.


Each of these strengths, however, is turned toward evil once the ugly head of ambition arises. He is confronted with his destiny to be king. His initiative makes him decide to murder Duncan, rather than letting fate take its course. His loyalty to his king is quickly cast aside, replacing it with loyalty toward himself. Though he is called weak by his wife, he commands his strength to do the terrible deed. It is the first murder only that is difficult. His conscience is cauterized, making each succeeding murder easy. His confidence in his abilities as well as in the truth of the prophecy, helps him to justify his actions.  His bravery is thus returned, seeing these murders as part of the "battlefield" in his war to gain the crown. These strengths lead to his downfall, as the acceptance of evil turns them into flaws.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more