Skip to main content

What were the positives and negatives of the Confederation era? How did the construction of both the Constitution and Bill of Rights reflect the...

In this post, you are asking two questions, I will answer the first question and then will briefly address the other question.


The Articles of Confederation was the name of our first plan of government. It had some successes and many weaknesses. It is important to remember that this plan of government was designed to be a weak plan of government.


The Articles of Confederation allowed the United States to start functioning as a country. It was also designed to prevent any person or group from having too much power. We fought for our independence, in part, because we thought the King of England abused his power.


The government created by the Articles of Confederation developed an orderly plan to sell western land. The Land Ordinance of 1785 created townships that were divided into squares. People could buy land in these squares. This was an excellent way for the government to raise money. This law was one of the successes of the Articles of Confederation.


The government also developed an effective plan for bringing territories into the country as states. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 allowed a territory to petition Congress for statehood upon reaching a population of 60,000 people.


Because the plan created a weak federal government, there were problems. The federal government couldn’t tax people. This made it hard for the government to raise money and pay its debts. The federal government also couldn’t require that people join the military. This made it hard for the government to deal with countries that were pushing us around, such as Spain and Great Britain. Another issue was that there were no federal courts to help states resolve disputes that they had with each other. There also were times the federal government had trouble keeping order, as was seen with Shays’ Rebellion.


Because of these weaknesses, a decision was made to meet in Philadelphia to consider developing a new, stronger plan of government. This led to the development of the Constitution. The Constitution was created to correct some of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation while keeping our country as a republic. For example, the federal government had the right to levy taxes. The Constitution also created a court system, which was part of the judicial branch. However, to prevent any person or part of government from having too much power, many states insisted that a Bill of Rights be added to the Constitution. An agreement was made to add the Bill of Rights to the Constitution. The Bill of Rights was the first ten amendments to the Constitution.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.